Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 October 26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 26

[edit]

Category:Tatort (film)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 10:38, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Firstly, disambiguation is not necessary here, as we do not have another Tatort to compete with this one for the category name. Secondly, even if disambiguation were necessary, Tatort is a television series, not a film. Bearcat (talk) 20:50, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Criminal comedy

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 10:39, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: As with Criminal comedy films, this genre of film and television entertainment is called "crime comedy", not "criminal comedy". The distinction is important, because crime comedy is not necessarily always about the criminals per se: it can also be about the crime victims, or the cops or private detectives trying to solve the crime. And similarly, our parallel categories for crime-related drama are all at "crime drama" rather than "criminal drama". Bearcat (talk) 16:46, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Library websites

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: disperse, then delete. MER-C 10:41, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: seem to be the same thing Rathfelder (talk) 18:31, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • If we remove those articles - which are what confused me - I dont think Category:Library websites is worth keeping. Certainly in the UK it is normal now for libraries to have websites and online facilities. I think we should merge it into Libraries. Again, in the UK, and I think most of the world, now, all the catalogues are online. Its not a defining characteristic. The actual contents of Category:Online catalogues are a mess, and I think that should probably go too. Rathfelder (talk) 22:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 09:09, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:The Bar-Kays albums

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 20#Category:The Bar-Kays albums

Category:Adult websites

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge manually. MER-C 10:49, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No actual articles. Unnecessary intermediate category. Rathfelder (talk) 16:38, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 09:09, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This grouping isn't useful, users looking for "adult websites" would almost certainly be looking for "Erotica and pornography websites‎" and don't benefit from going through an extra container category. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 22:31, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Behavior models

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 3#Category:Behavior models

Category:Behavior selection algorithms

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 3#Category:Behavior selection algorithms

Category:Behavior modelling

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 3#Category:Behavior modelling