The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The parent category will naturally become empty when both the merger of this nomination and the merger at the bottom of the page get consensus. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:30, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Generally unverifiable therefore original research. Also, not all games that are on Steam went through Steam Greenlight so this category doesn't contain all Steam games either. wumbolo^^^08:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thirdparty coverage of these games will generally note having gone through the Greenlight process (a process which no longer is active but had been used to allow user-voted games to be deemed appropriate to include on Steam, so there was recognizition needed for these games). The second aspect doesn't make sense. It's not meant to contain all Steam games (which would be too large and inappropriate), only the subset that actually got onto Steam as cleared by Greenlight. --Masem (t) 12:31, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NONDEF, while checking the articles in this category it seems like this is an only minor characteristic of these games. No objection against listification. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:37, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is clearly verifiable ("not verified for a particular game" = a sourcing problem at that particular article). Steam (software)#Steam Greenlight is an entire section and potentially could be a split-off article. This might or might not be defining, but subcats do not have to be defining, and are a sometimes arbitrary, just to split up a large category. — SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 19:05, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It's not too hard to verify the subject as being either on greenlight, or not. Nothing particularly wrong with having a category for games that went through Greenlight. Lee Vilenski(talk • contribs)09:14, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - sources generally mention if a game went through the Greenlight process, making it a characteristic of the game, so I disagree with the OP. ~ Dissident93(talk)10:22, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's more of an issue with the articles lacking information. If you searched for sources about them, I'm fairly confident the majority would mention the fact they were on Greenlight. ~ Dissident93(talk)04:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose Smash Bros and the games listed in the cat are not traditional like Tekken or Street Fighter, there should be a division. Jamesdenn (talk) 16:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unclear thus SUBJ or OR; moreover, we tend not to categorize things as what they are not; here defined as "Fighting games that do not follow Street Fighter II semantics." Thus if we could be clear, probably not defining. Maybe we need categories like games that have protagonists not named Mario or Luigi? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:16, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Beware minefields -- Macedonia was in effect partitioned between Greece and Serbia in the Balkan wars. I see no objection to using "Greek Macedonia" when we want to refer to the present Greek province,as opposed to Republic of Macedonia. Before that we should use contemporary polities. For the classical period, that means Macedonia (or ancient Macedonia) should refer to the original kingdom of Philip and Alexander, with Thessaly to the north. Before that I assume that we just do not know boundaries, so that Category:Neolithic sites in Greek Macedonia would have to be accepted. Peterkingiron (talk) 08:48, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
