Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 September 28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 28

[edit]

Category:Lists of jazz festivals

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete and re-categorize sole article to parent categories. Multiple redirects not re-categorized. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: All entries are redirects to the main article. —Justin (koavf)TCM 22:16, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:De La Salle Brothers schools in Hong Kong

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename per this discussion. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2C contested by Armbrust with reference to this recent CfD. Whatever was decided there, this is a simple realignment with other members of Category:Lasallian educational institutions, namely Category:Lasallian schools in Singapore and Category:Lasallian schools in the United States. --BDD (talk) 19:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fantasy horror films

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk)
Nominator's rationale: Seems to do the same things as Category:Supernatural horror films. Fantasy usually is a more pleasant fictional event, (i.e: dogs that talk, life after death, etc.) so I think Supernatural horror is the better terminology here. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sojourned

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: nomination closed as user error. Bearcat (talk) 19:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Will combine Si Trew (talk) 14:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is a redlinked category, which according to its edit history has never actually existed at all. Did you just misspell the link for another category? Never mind, I've found what happened. The nominated page is actually a redirect, not a category, but the nomination statement ended up here because the nominator accidentally used the wrong template to nominate it (which I've done at least once too.) Nominator has already resubmitted the nomination to MFD, so there's no need to leave this open given that there's nothing for CFD to discuss. Bearcat (talk) 19:16, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Adjutant Generals of Illinois

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename Category:Adjutant Generals of Illinois to Category:Adjutants General of Illinois and Category:Adjutant Generals to Category:Adjutants general of the National Guard of the United States. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:32, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The plural of "adjutant general" is "adjutants general", not "adjutant generals" -- adjutant is the noun and general is the adjective, not vice versa. (See, frex, the correctly named Category:Adjutants General of New York.) Bearcat (talk) 09:44, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Necrothesp makes a good point about the general category. I'd support that option as well. Bearcat (talk) 17:10, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Left 4 Dead

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 15:34, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Too little content. —Justin (koavf)TCM 05:36, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Good Ol’factory (talk) 06:33, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Gackt

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Too little content--there are just two interlkinked subcats and one main article which is linked from them as well. The only other thing in here is a navbox and Tempest 3D, which does not justify an eponymous category. —Justin (koavf)TCM 05:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Regional Italian

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: By the contents of the target category, these are synonymous, although Dialects of Italian is a dab page, the cat covers one of the meanings only, and per WP:SMALLCAT to merge to the larger one. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 05:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.