Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 June 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 17

[edit]

Category:Nonprofit organizations

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename, without prejudice to a broader nominating to rename all of the subcategories to the non-hyphenated version. Or, users could try to get the article changed back. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:14, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Bring it in line with all its sub-categories Rathfelder (talk) 22:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Korolyov

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Korolyov (inhabited locality) is a disambiguation page, the name of the actual article is Korolyov, Moscow Oblast. Geregen2 (talk) 13:18, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Episcopalian categories

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:02, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: "Episcopalian" is a term that refers to a member of number of Anglican churches in the world that (for various historical reasons) have the word "Episcopal" in their name. (These churches include: Episcopal Church (United States), Scottish Episcopal Church, Anglican Episcopal Church of Brazil, Episcopal Church of Cuba, Episcopal Church of Cuba, Episcopal Church in the Philippines, Spanish Reformed Episcopal Church, Province of the Episcopal Church of South Sudan and Sudan.) The fact that the churches' names share the word "Episcopal" does not denote any particular ties between them other than their ties through the Anglican Communion and the Anglican tradition and so merely sharing a name seems to be no sound basis for categorisation. I cannot, for example, imagine that someone might want a list of Anglican feminists who are also members of churches that share a similar name. Graham (talk) 06:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it's necessary to rename to "Anglicans and Episcopalians" as there isn't any doubt that Episcopalians are Anglicans. Similarly, it's not called the Anglican and Episcopalian Communion. Graham (talk) 18:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hey Look! It's That Mad Wrestling Thing Aff The Telly Tour

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. WP:UND applies. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 06:36, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:OVERCAT, WP:SMALLCAT. The two articles here are already in the parent. MSJapan (talk) 04:55, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wholesalers established in 1820

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge per proposal 1. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Proposal 1
  • Propose merging:
Proposal 2
  • Propose renaming:
  • Propose merging:
Nominator's rationale: WP:NARROWCATs that will never be sufficiently populated. PanchoS (talk) 03:05, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as suggested — I created these and do not really agree that they "will never be sufficiently populated", but I don't oppose the suggested merger as it simplifies the overall category structure. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Siblings of Presidents of the United States

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 11:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NONDEFINING
The US has no formal title or informal cultural role for brothers and sisters of Presidents like we do for First Ladies. Now many of these people are defined by being a relative of some sort with the President which is why all 50 articles are also under their specific family category in the Category:First Families of the United States tree. For instance, Billy Carter is under Category:Carter family. But, I don't think Billy Carter would have been any more or less of a national embarrassment if he was an uncle or a first cousin instead of a brother so double categorizing him as a sibling of some president isn't defining. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:08, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Notified The wub as the category creator and this discussion has been included in WikiProject United States Presidents. – RevelationDirect (talk) 01:08, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Recipients of the Order of the Palmetto

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: upmerged and deleted as proposed. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 06:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:V and WP:OCAWARD (WP:NONDEFINING)
The Order of the Palmetto is a state government award of South Carolina, although it has the feel of a small town mayor's key to the city. A local magazine described it best: "Past recipients have included singer James Brown, author Pat Conroy, tap dancer Clayton 'Peg Leg' Bates, Civil Rights activist Septima Clark, and many others including past governors." (source). That news story was about the governor giving the award to the owners of a Lexus dealership, which is apparently something that happens in South Carolina. At least 3,500 people have received the award, but it's impossible to verify all recipients because there is no complete list (source). - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:29, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Notified Scanlan as the apparent category creator and this discussion has been included in WikiProject South Carolina. – RevelationDirect (talk) 01:05, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Canadian Mining Hall of Fame

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Per WP:OCAWARD (WP:NONDEFINING)
The Canadian Mining Hall of Fame consists of plaques with the 100+ winners at the University of Toronto and a small exhibit at the Royal Ontario Museum. It's hard to see how people who died in 1916, in 1922 and in 1957 are defined by an award created in 1998. Even for people who lived to see it, the award receives only a passing reference in the articles. Without exception, all the people in this category are already under Category:Canadian miners, Category:Canadian mining engineers, Category:Canadian mining businesspeople, Category:Canadian geologists, Category:Canadian prospectors or Category:Canadian metallurgists and the list of winners is located here. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Notified Marco Thomas as the category creator and this discussion has been included in WikiProject Mining. – RevelationDirect (talk) 01:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, this is no less defining than any other hall of fame inductee category. Many people are inducted into halls of fame posthumously (example Lord Stanley died in 1908, whilst the hall of fame was established in 1943). This sort of recognition is generally only a line item in an article, although some expansion within the articles could be done (For example, so and so was inducted into the mining hall of fame for their contributions to this thing).--kelapstick(bainuu) 01:35, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Kelapstick: The earlier Hall of Fame nominations here, here, here and here may provide some background. - RevelationDirect (talk) 09:33, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.