Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 March 20

< March 19	March 21 >

March 20

Category:Road transport in the Caribbean

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep (NAC). DexDor (talk) 11:01, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Propose Upmerging Category:Road transport in the Caribbean to Category:Road transportation in North America

Nominator's rationale: Per WP:OCLOCATION. This category takes islands with no physically connected roads and groups them together by their roads. This makes sense for other regions with inter-connnected highways and border crossings but, in this case, I don't think the region has any relevant bearing. Currently the category only contains a Cuban sub-category. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:33, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Notified Hugo999 as the category creator and this discussion has been included in Wikipedia:WikiProject Caribbean. – RevelationDirect (talk) 03:33, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Caribbean is a georegion for which we have a category tree for. It is also a common grouping in the real world. -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 03:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems like a logical grouping within Category:Road transportation in North America to me. Just because there is no physical intra-connection does not invalidate it. Twiceuponatime (talk) 09:14, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – rather a surprising nom. A standard subcat of Category:Transport in the Caribbean. Oculi (talk) 15:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as part of category tree Hugo999 (talk) 21:38, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- The Caribeean is a geo-region, lying between North and South America. Since it is made up os islands it is not part of either continent. How useful a general article on Road transport in the Caribbean would be might be questioned, but that is certainly no reason for removing a category. Peterkingiron (talk) 10:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.