Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 September 4

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< September 3 September 5 >

September 4

[edit]

Category:2012–13 in Indonesian football

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic London 13:03, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename to match contents, which all use a calendar year from 2013 onwards. I accept that the contents and head categories will need pruning slightly, and will do this. – Fayenatic London 22:03, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sport in Nishapur

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. – Fayenatic London 07:19, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small category, only one article, about a football cub. This article is already is in Category:Football clubs in Iran. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:27, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Current ministerial offices in the United Kingdom

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: upmerge. (Deletion would be most unhelpful.) The Defunct category suffices to separate current from former. – Fayenatic London 08:44, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: We don't categorize by current status. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes - if an article is categorized correctly then it should never (apart from special cases like Living people category), be necessary to remove that article from a category, but the article may become eligible to be "moved" to a subcategory. DexDor (talk) 22:16, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment We actually also do remove people from religious categories are put them in categories like Category:Former Roman Catholics. It is unclear if Mrs. De Blasio would still fit in an LGBT category despite her having written an essay that asserted being Lesbian, but I can see successful arguments that LGBT should not be applied to people who currently reject that label even if they embraced it in the past. However most categories it is not possible to loose. We also have a few for people who had awards officially revoked from them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:48, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Current Indian state and territorial ministries

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Lists of current Indian state and territorial ministries, as it currently contains only lists, not individuals. – Fayenatic London 07:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: We don't categorize by current status. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:52, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Holy Child College of Davao

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: administrative close: deleted by another user. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:22, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is a non-notable article disguised as a category. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Pro-government people of the 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename, as there is no consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 12:16, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: More correct name (as creator). People of another side named Category:Pro-Russian people of the 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine. NickSt (talk) 11:18, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are two sides in this unrest/conflict/war: Pro-Russian (DNR, LNR, Russian) and Ukrainian sides. Key people (limited number) from both sides included in article's infoboxes, navboxes etc. They must be categorized under different subcategories, clearly. Subcategory's name are subject for this discussion. NickSt (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is about a strict definition of key people. From the one side I can imagine that key people are the leaders of Federal State of Novorossiya, so that would be suitable as a category. However, I can't imagine how one would define key people of the other side. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete people by one issue position is usually wrong. Here "pro-government" is doubly problematic, as in people who were pro the government of the president who up and fled were pro-government once too, and if this is defining, changing sides doesn't change their categories... right? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:48, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Companies of the Arab League

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Sub-cats were not tagged, so have been nominated at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_September_16#More_companies_of_the_Arab_League. – Fayenatic London 21:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The Arab League is a political organisation that doesn't have companies either belonging to it or registered to it as an entity. Aviabranding (talk) 00:37, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:21, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Notability is not inherited, so places "related" to or "associated with" categories are improper. Imagine: Category:Napoleon-related places, Category:Football-related places, or the like. The paranormal should not be treated differently than the normal. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:34, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_September_4&oldid=1138408149"