Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 August 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< August 28 August 30 >

August 29

[edit]

Category:List of beauty pageant in Nigeria

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy deleted.  —SMALLJIM  08:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The items in the list have no links and are unverifiable. The references are all connected with just one item in the list. The content on the page is duplicated in another article World Miss University Nigeria Sesamevoila (talk) 18:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Welsh ship-owners

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. The Welsh-to-British concept might be better considered on a wider level, rather than just this category.--Mike Selinker (talk) 05:35, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: To match parent Category:British businesspeople in shipping and grandparent Category:Businesspeople in shipping. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:53, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Makes sense. FruitMonkey (talk) 11:08, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Very sensible rationale. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 07:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lamborghini Countach

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: mostly user pages. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 08:52, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep: Those "user pages" are templates. If someone could make separate pages for the different versions of the Lamborghini Countach, they could be added, and this conversation would be moot (See Category:Ford Focus for an example). Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 10:08, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Acting President of India

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Upmerge. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:45, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 08:46, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Law firms based in San Jose, California

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: upmerge to Category:Law firms based in California and Category:Companies based in San Jose, California. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:04, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 07:46, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, yep. Upmerge to the approp cats. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 06:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:The Next Food Network Star

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy close. Discussion has now been moved here. (NAC) Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 07:50, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename. The parent article has been renamed; shouldn't the category be renamed as well? Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 07:27, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Progress spacecraft

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted at CfD 2012 September 16. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:55, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Although technically correct under its current name (each mission did, in fact, use a different Progress spacecraft), the purpose of this category is to categorise missions flown by Progress spacecraft. The proposed name would be consistent with Category:Manned Soyuz missions and Category:Space Shuttle missions as well, which categorise the same thing - articles on individual missions - for their respective spacecraft. The Bushranger One ping only 06:43, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose, the articles cover (or at least should cover) both the spacecraft and the mission, so the current title would be more inclusive of both. --W. D. Graham 08:27, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:TsKB aircraft

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: As a rule, Soviet aircraft are designated and classified by designer/design bureaux, not the central bureau and/or state factory that built them. In this case, the article is already correctly named - and categorised - leaving this spurious category for the Central Design Bureau (TsKB), which acted as a 'clearinghouse' for many designers (including Polikarpov, Ilyushin, and others). Therefore categorising aircraft as 'from TsKB' is erronious (and is, in fact, not done anywhere but here) and so this should be deleted as redundant. The Bushranger One ping only 06:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Asteroid spacecraft

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:05, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is a clear case of category duplication; 'missions to asteroids' is the preferred title format for this sort of thing (and avoids the ambiguity of possibly meaning "spacecraft that are asteroids"). The Bushranger One ping only 06:11, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Satellite images of the continents

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:16, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Single-file category. Unlikely to be expanded as all new images are likely to be Commons; only contents is in fact a file at Commons but with a Featured Picture tag here, so I'm not sure it should even be categorised at all on this project. If so an upmerge to Category:Images from satellites could work. The Bushranger One ping only 06:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Deaths by impalement

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename C2C. The Bushranger One ping only 03:41, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: To correspond with the other categories in Category:Executions by method Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:LGBT hip hop musicians

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: upmerge to Category:Hip hop musicians and Category:LGBT musicians. The Bushranger One ping only 00:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Overcat - there's not enough to warrant a subdivision of LGBT musicians for this genre. MSJapan (talk) 02:40, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:WikiSkills members

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:10, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete. No page on WikiSkills, so cannot possibly foster collaboration. Extensive precedent to delete "Wikipedians by website" categories where the website is not notable enough for an article. The userbox that populates this category links to a website, so presumed to be a "Wikipedians by website" category. VegaDark (talk) 00:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral: I created this category for my own convenience, but have no strong opinion. Wikimedia Sweden is one of the partners involved in this project, in case that matters. Rotsee (talk) 14:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_August_29&oldid=1138396109"