Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MdupontBot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Request Expired.

MdupontBot[edit]

(BRFA
Approved BRFAs
talk
contribs
count
SUL
logs
page moves
block log
rights log
flag)

Operator: Mdupont (talk · contribs)

Time filed: 11:19, Sunday November 28, 2010 (UTC)

Automatic or Manually assisted:

Programming language(s): pywikipedia bot

Source code available:

Function overview: I am using the bot for simple category management tasks.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): Once in a while

Estimated number of pages affected: 200

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): default in pywikipedia

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function details: simple usage of pywikipedia bot for cleaning up in kosovo articles.

Discussion[edit]

(Fixed operator, exc. compliance and bot flag fields) Please mark whether this bot is automatic or manually assisted. You also need to be specific and precise as to the function details. Please expand on what the "simple category management tasks" are. The approval can only be given for specific tasks. The bot's account page should not redirect to your own user page and should instead indicate that this is your alternative bot account. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:43, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}} Please address the issues pointed out by H3llkn0wz. - EdoDodo ^talk 09:48, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The bot will be only run under my supervision for specific tasks, not unattended. I am working on geographic categories of Kosovo, lists of villages in municipalities, lists of mountains, rivers, important buildings. I have been working on openstreetmap and gns names, and would like to fix the coordinates of articles. OK, about the redirect, will fix that. My plan is to integrate the openstreetmap, wikipedia and gns data so that we have all the villages in kosovo in the end on wikipedia with all relevant information about them in a nice format. It is alot of work. thanks, mike James Michael DuPont (talk) 10:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Let's see this bot in action. - EdoDodo ^talk 10:24, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) Any updates? - Jarry1250 ^{[Who? Discuss.]} 11:57, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sorry for the long reply. I did not see the notice on my wall until now. I can do some edits, Am very much lagging right now. James Michael DuPont (talk) 14:38, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) Any updates? MBisanz ^talk 00:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request Expired., feel free to reopen when you're ready. --Chris 12:30, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.