Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2023/10

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Medical prescription[edit]

Medical prescription – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 415 daily hits

  • Important, complex topic with fairly high hits; yet, the article is orange-tagged. Could use a lot of help from multiple editors. BorgQueen (talk) 06:32, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, high hits, important article, and needs lots of help. SVcode(Talk) 21:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per above Brachy08 (Talk) 09:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, the article definitely needs a makeover, and retrieving good-quality information for it shouldn't be a difficult task. Oltrepier (talk) 16:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support, per above comments B3251 (talk) 17:54, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support, per above. – RotciW 19:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 23:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Alan Hollinghurst[edit]

Alan Hollinghurst – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 91 daily hits

  • Vital article in People, Writers.
  • Some references but very stubby BLP. Practically nothing on his writing.
  • Established writer, with a publication history going back to the 1970s, fiction since the 1980s and articles for all his novels.
  • Even pipped future poet laureate Andrew Motion to the Newdigate Prize. Other awards, including lifetime achievement, from 1974 onwards.
  • A Booker Prize winner, so obviously important.
  • Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature - obviously this is very important.
  • External links might offer options for expansion, particularly the article from The Paris Review.
  • X00y (talk) 22:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, vital article in need of expanion. SVcode(Talk) 23:44, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, low number of page views and not clear how he is vital (but I acknowledge that might be an issue with the article). Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:00, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Too regional --Wil540 art (talk) 03:16, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose low daily views. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Seems good enough. Brachy08 (Talk) 09:54, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved Utopes (talk / cont) 23:04, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Rigatoni[edit]

Rigatoni – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 713 daily hits

  • WAY too high of a daily view counter for it to be a stub class. This article needs expansion, so it can fit it’s size/viewership ratio. roasted (talk) 3:44 1 July, 2023 (UTC)
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 17:17, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per above (and because... why not? : D ) Oltrepier (talk) 16:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 16:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support per nom. RotciW 23:40, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support, was shocked when I saw the barebones-ness of the article. Could definitely go for improvement. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:24, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 23:05, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Alonso Quijano[edit]

Alonso Quijano – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 91 daily hits

  • Main Protagonist of Don Quixote, the first modern novel, and the first big hit of literature ever, it is one of the most translated books ever, and it is short and has no citations. Sportsfangnome (talk) 18:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - could need projects help.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:54, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, an important article that needs improvement.SVcode(Talk) 19:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per above. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:54, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 23:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Carbon source[edit]

Carbon source – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 10 daily hits

  • Because molecules that an organism uses as its carbon source for generating biomass are referred to as "carbon sources" in biology. Highly relevant topic and an article that needs an update. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:13, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, though doesn't have vital level or high hits, it is an important one in need of help.SVcode(Talk) 00:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Looks good to go.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:43, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, per above Brachy08 (Talk) 03:52, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 23:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Gundam Evolution[edit]

Gundam Evolution – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 115 daily hits

  • This video game, although no vital, actually is still notable, not obscure and the article on it is a mere stub, meaning it requires expansion.--RekishiEJ (talk) 16:58, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose only 115 daily hits, and a tag on the article is opposite of what you said saying, "This article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines." MasterMatt12💬 ● 📝 00:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, not really notable. SVcode(Talk) 23:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose, per above. Brachy08 (Talk) 23:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved Utopes (talk / cont) 23:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Aladdin (BlackRock)[edit]

Aladdin (BlackRock) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 473 daily hits

  • Software program vital to the operations of financial and investment institutions including BlackRock, whose page has prominent links to it. As per the current page, this software is used to manage over $20 trillion annually, but it is a stub and information on the page is extremely out of date (it was last edited in December 2022). Considering Aladdin's vital role in the current global economy, it's important to have accessible information about it, especially since it seems that non-primary sources about the system are sparse on the Internet.

This topic is relevant to multiple categories. Due to its scope, and the sheer scale of the monetary assets it is involved with. I feel it should also receive higher importance in the WikiProjects it is listed in — currently it is a part of 4 WikiProjects, but is of Low importance for 3 and unranked in the last. Because of the above reasons, my opinion is that its importance should be increased by one tier in each WikiProject and potentially raised to High-importance in WikiProject Finance & Investment.Ooo Salt ooo (talk) 01:08, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support, important article in need of expansion. SVcode(Talk) 22:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Looks good to go. And project can definitely help. BabbaQ (talk) 08:00, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom. BorgQueen (talk) 08:36, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 23:08, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chechen cuisine[edit]

Chechen cuisine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 41 daily hits

  • This article, though being important ([1], [2] and [3] mention Chechen dishes, meaning this cuisine is no doubt appealing), is a mere stub, meaning it definitely should be an AFI. --RekishiEJ (talk) 13:16, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support BorgQueen (talk) 17:37, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, less hits. SVcode(Talk)
  3. Support - Looks good to go. And project can definitely help.BabbaQ (talk) 07:57, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support per above. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral - More of a list per se, but could still use support. Roasted (talk) 22:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support, article is currently quite rough and could use overhaul and refinement. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 08:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Ossetian cuisine[edit]

Ossetian cuisine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 13 daily hits

  • As Ossetian pies are now all the rage in the entire Russia (cf. [4] & [5]), this cuisine is no doubt crucial, however the article is now a mere stub, which is a shame. --RekishiEJ (talk) 03:47, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, hits too low.SVcode(Talk) 00:25, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @SVcode: Comment This article is not widely read, yet it is an invalid reason to oppose my proposal since the unpopularity of this article is probably because it is a stub.--RekishiEJ (talk) 06:50, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Well,The issue is that the article, while it does pass Non-Controversial and Stubby, It doesn’t jump over hits,and for Importance..It’s at a ??? but it doesn’t seem Top or High. As a result,that’s a. 2.5/4. That’s not enough for me to go support,but it isn’t enough for me to go Oppose. Danubeball (talk) 17:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral per my comment. Danubeball (talk) 17:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose a current fad/trend and long-term vitalness is unclear, especially with the low number of page hits. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:01, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment this article is now regarded vital at level 5. --RekishiEJ (talk) 16:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, very low hits generally, and does not seem as important as, say, Chechen cuisine, with triple the hits. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:50, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved Utopes (talk / cont) 08:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Ziti[edit]

Ziti – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 201 daily hits

  • 138 direct links to the page, so relevant to many Wikipedia pages. Also might need merging with baked ziti due to similarities. It can likely be expanded. roasted (talk 00:20 27 June, 2023 (UTC)
  1. Support, has decent amount of hits, needs more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per above and because... why not? : D Oltrepier (talk) 16:23, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support as per nom. Wil540 art (talk) 05:48, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 08:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Abolitionism[edit]

Abolitionism – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - ~900 daily hits

  • A subject of monumental importance to world history, politics, humanity's social evolution and the history of the struggle for racial equality and human rights. The page is currently in a poor state of verification, with numerous unsourced parts. Iskandar323 (talk) 07:08, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 00:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per above. Oltrepier (talk) 16:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support as per nom. Wil540 art (talk) 05:48, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 08:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Hunger strike[edit]

Hunger strike – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 749 daily hits

  • Article has multiple issues, needs help. SVcode(Talk) 23:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support per nom. The topic comes up regularly in the news, for obvious reasons. BorgQueen (talk) 10:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support as per nom. Wil540 art (talk) 05:48, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, tagged for over a decade and requires much needed cleanup. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 08:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Polling station[edit]

Polling station – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 92 daily hits

  • Though with low hits, this is by no means an important article that needs updating and some expansion. SVcode(Talk) 22:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - Could need the projects help.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:16, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, definitely a worthwhile effort to fix. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:17, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support as per nom. Wil540 art (talk) 05:48, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 08:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Keygen[edit]

Keygen – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 123 daily hits

  • This article is absolutely crucial, since keygens illegitimately distributed may contain malware, and computer security is absolutely vital even for average PC users, yet it is currently a mere stub.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Neutral, Even though it seems important, it isn't vital article and doesn't have enough hits. SVcode(Talk) 00:11, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Per nom --Wil540 art (talk) 03:19, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - Looks good to go. And project can definitely help.BabbaQ (talk) 07:59, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support as an important article in need of improvement. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 08:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Browser wars[edit]

Browser wars – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 217 daily hits

  • Article that needs more improvement with citations and cleanup. SVcode(Talk) 00:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose. A decent C-class article on a niche topic, and in an area that benefits from systemic bias. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 05:30, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support indeed, could need the help of the project.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral Article can be improved, but is also niche and can face bias Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose, as per Sdkb. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:04, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Interesting topic but somewhat niche and historic at this point. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:22, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose per above, does not seem necessary now. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved Utopes (talk / cont) 08:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Environmental impacts of animal agriculture[edit]

Environmental impacts of animal agriculture – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 157 daily hits

  • Although this article is seemingly detailed, in actuality it is not comprehensive enough, since the "Beneficial environmental effects" section requires expansion, and some statements are currently tagged with "citation needed", "failed verification" and "further explanation needed", meaning this article ought to be an AFI.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Neutral, I'm not sure if this should be in AFI because article seems good enough without the "citation needed", "failed verification", etc. SVcode(Talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Article can be improved with sources Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Long article, minority of sections need improvement. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:41, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose, as per PerfectSoundWhatever. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Article is rather in-depth/comprehensive already. It needs a couple experts to come edit it, not AFI. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:27, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose, receives regular updates, and does not appear to be in a dire state of requiring improvement. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:27, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved Utopes (talk / cont) 08:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Entergy[edit]

Entergy – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 79 daily hits

  • This article contains outdated information, notably on the status of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant, which closed in 2012. This article is in desperate need of an update. WikiRegularAtSchool (talk) 15:32, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose, article doesn't seem important though it needs help. SVcode(Talk) 23:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose low daily hits, and the article isn't very important. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose, does not seem to require AFI for one instance of outdated information. Could definitely use help but does not need a whole week, I think. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved Utopes (talk / cont) 08:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Ulead PhotoImpact[edit]

Ulead PhotoImpact – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 16 daily hits

  • A once popular Windows-only raster image editor among amateur photographers and web designers guarantees its importance, though it is now discontinued.--RekishiEJ (talk) 14:42, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose, doesn't seem important. SVcode(Talk) 23:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose per low viewership and general importance. Iskandar323 (talk) 10:47, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose, definitely needs some work as most of the references are press releases, but the views are quite low and does not seem to be important enough for an overhaul. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved Utopes (talk / cont) 08:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Integrated care system[edit]

Integrated care system – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 29 daily hits

  • ICSs have become statutory in England since 1 July 2022, and I don't think the article explains them accurately at all or references more recent NHS guidance on them. Still largely in future tense. Highly important as they are the bodies that commission all the nationalised health and care services in England. The page for the bodies they replaced, clinical commissioning groups, has 55 daily views. Djelibey (talk) 21:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose, less hits and isn't vital article. SVcode(Talk) 23:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, too regional for AFI. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:39, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose, hits are down to the low 20s, and is too regional. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved Utopes (talk / cont) 08:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Fast bowling[edit]

Fast bowling – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 291 daily hits

  • Important article that is underdeveloped and needs more citations. SVcode(Talk) 15:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - Could get help from project.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Plenty of potential for improvement. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 11:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose. There are many many areas of Wikipedia without an active editor base that desperately need this project's help. Cricket articles are absolutely not one of them. Can we please try harder to make this project one that reduces Wikipedia's systemic bias rather than reinforcing it? {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:10, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    We are here to evaluate this article, not the area of the articles scope. Nor the fact that other articles might need our help even more. If you have those concerns, then nominate those articles. A nomination concerns the article, not the scope.BabbaQ (talk) 14:03, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @BabbaQ, there can only be one weekly AFI at a time, and giving it to this article would mean denying it to a different one. So yes, I think it matters if there are other articles that need our help far more. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 17:53, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose, concur with Sdkb. Scope should matter at AFI, some topics are just never suitable. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 10:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral Article can be improved but does not have a large scope Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose Too long, not vital-y enough. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:24, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose, Too regional --Wil540 art (talk) 03:45, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose. While the article is definitely in need of improvement, it does not seem to warrant AFI's focus per above. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved Utopes (talk / cont) 08:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Human geography[edit]

Human geography – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 429 daily hits

  • Level-5 Vital article in need of section expansion and citation help. SVcode(Talk) 00:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support. Level 5 vital article and high daily hits. Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 23:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support as per nom. Wil540 art (talk) 05:48, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support as an important article in need of development. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 19:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Ambush[edit]

Ambush – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 177 daily hits

  • Even though hits are a bit low, this article is still very important that needs improvement. SVcode(Talk) 22:42, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - Tim O'Doherty (talk) 22:44, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Looks good to go.BabbaQ (talk) 18:42, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, would definitely benefit from AFI. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 19:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Jewish deli[edit]

Jewish deli – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 103 daily hits

  • Historically relevant topic as delicatessens are now seen all over the world. The article is a stub and very thin on information. --Wil540 art (talk) 18:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support An important stub.--RekishiEJ (talk) 08:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral, needs improvement but doesn't have lot of hits. I am keeping it at neutral because it seems to be important. SVcode(Talk) 00:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - Looks good to go. And project can definitely help. Agree with nom.BabbaQ (talk) 08:00, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support per nom as a historically relevant topic which would benefit from AFI. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 19:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Fenghuang[edit]

Fenghuang – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 508 daily hits

  1. Support, Lots of hits but needs expansion and more citations. SVcode(Talk) 00:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per above. Brachy08 (Talk) 01:54, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per the above. The topic is highly important and needs significant improvement. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:50, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved Utopes (talk / cont) 19:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battery indicator[edit]

Battery indicator – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 36 daily hits

  • While the hits may be less than ideal, this is a topic of high importance which existed without any references from 2007-2012, where it received its first (and only) source since. Could definitely use further development and linkage. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:04, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support as per nom. Wil540 art (talk) 05:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom. —Stewpot 18:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom. SVcode(Talk) 22:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved SVcode(Talk) 22:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Dance studio[edit]

Dance studio – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 30 daily hits

  • A deeply underdeveloped general-topic article in an area that suffers from systemic bias (WP:WikiProject Dance is tagged inactive). {{u|Sdkb}} talk 22:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, the article definitely needs love and integration as a high importance stub. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:09, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support as per nom. Wil540 art (talk) 05:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support an notable article in need of expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ApprovedSVcode(Talk) 23:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Chess[edit]

Chess – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 5729 daily hits

  1. Support, per above. Plus, while the page generally looks alright, the first half likely lacks citations, and there are some deprecated/unreliable sources here and there. Oltrepier (talk) 16:28, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral, has gone through 4 Featured Article Reviews before being demoted. Is now at B class. Re-instilling as a FA seems like a notable pursuit and I'd love to witness it as the article does need improvements, but that's about it. Unsure if AfI is the way forward there. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support as per nom. Wil540 art (talk) 05:48, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 22:57, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved SVcode(Talk) 23:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Romina Pourmokhtari[edit]

Romina Pourmokhtari – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 84 daily hits

  • This article is definitely crucial, since Pourmokhtari is currently the Minister for the Environment in Sweden, and it is a mere stub and has a lot of daily hits, hence it definitely should be an AFI. --RekishiEJ (talk) 05:16, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, has lots of hits but needs more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - reviewed, The project could really improve this article.BabbaQ (talk) 22:49, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support: it seems like the article has been expanded a bit since you nominated it, but still, it could use some more work! Oltrepier (talk) 07:39, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support: per comments above. – RotciW 19:04, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose, hits have greatly declined since the nomination (from >1000 to <100), and the article is now at start class. AFI does not seem to be the correct venue now. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:13, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ApprovedSVcode(Talk) 23:10, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cove[edit]

Cove – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 135 daily hits

  • A highly general article created in 2003 which has never received an inline citation, to the best of my knowledge, in the last 20 years (literally). Pageviews are down-ish but still is a perennial topic. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Relevant topic and could use a scientific tune up. --Wil540 art (talk) 18:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, Notable article in need of help. SVcode(Talk) 23:11, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, It's not an irrelevant topic at all, so any kind of improvement will hugely benefit it. Oltrepier (talk) 19:24, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ApprovedSVcode(Talk) 23:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Rapids[edit]

Rapids – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 92 daily hits

  • Low-ish hits, but a level 4 Vital article which only had one reference since 2016. At some point a second inline citation was added, but nevertheless this article is in dire need of improvement. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Relevant topic and could use a scientific tune up. --Wil540 art (talk) 18:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Another important article in need of help. SVcode(Talk) 23:11, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, It's not an irrelevant topic at all, so any kind of improvement will definitely benefit it. Oltrepier (talk) 19:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ApprovedSVcode(Talk) 23:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_improvement/Nominations/Archives/2023/10&oldid=1182105438"