Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zyfra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zyfra

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company/Startup article that fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. First six refs don't mention the company. Run of the mill business finance news that fails WP:ORGIND as well. scope_creep^Talk 19:12, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:10, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:13, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NCORP | Celestina007 (talk) 00:52, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article fully complies with Wikipedia rules, which is shown in the first link. All the links have the company’s name. In addition, all references in the article are given to reputable sources. I will add two more links now --Egorov97 (talk) 13:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve added two more links to the article, now everything is fine, so and the article can be kept --Egorov97 (talk) 13:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is just more of the same, advertising and promotional references. scope_creep^Talk 13:11, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These are not commercial, but the reputed source links such as leading national newspapers and other media. --Egorov97 (talk) 13:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Egorov97: They are not links. This isn't a forum or social media site. They are sources when they are in a document or web page and references when they are in the article. Please refer to them as such. scope_creep^Talk 13:29, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete trivial mentions from sources are "legal" to keep in Wikipedia articles, but for the purpose of establishing the notability requirements for organizations and companies, these sources don't contribute towards it. The article is lacking significant reliable coverage in sources of general interest that have vast audience base. Graywalls (talk) 08:51, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.