Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zuber Mohsan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to lack notability. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zuber Mohsan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. Very little coverage of this businessman in reliable sources, and the closest he appears to come to WP:NPEOPLE is having once been nominated for an award. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as none of this suggests better applicable notability and my searches found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 05:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:42, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:42, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article sourced to one story about the subject's brother's businesses (where the subject is mentioned as "Zubhair") and an award nomination where the subject had been co-nominated with his brother. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED and I am seeing nothing (under either forename spelling) to indicate that this person meets biographical notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 08:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.