Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zornik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 00:10, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zornik

Was nominated for speedy, bringing it here for a vote...appears to be minor band with a few googles. Delete MONGO 10:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Compu ter Jo e 14:14, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It obviously needs cleanup, its to 'ra ra six boom ba' for me, but they do have an album out. B.ellis 16:30, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable enough. I cleaned up a bit. JoaoRicardo^talk 20:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup. Notability is not an issue, if I may quote Jimbo himself: Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing. But if you want to make it an issue, here goes.

Guideline:

Has won or placed in a major music competition.

Article:

The band made it to the finals of HUMO's Rock Rally rock contest.

Same guideline:

Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels.

Article:

There the band was spotted by Parlophone Belgium

Perhaps the article could use some cleaning up, making it clearer that Zornik meets the guidelines. - MB (Talk) 19:26, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

keep. they were on Parlophone. Kingturtle 09:07, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.