Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zomi is unhappy on the Myanmar Military and CNA

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:52, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zomi is unhappy on the Myanmar Military and CNA[edit]

Zomi is unhappy on the Myanmar Military and CNA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was the subject of an expired PROD. However, comments on the article's talk page clearly indicate that the article's author contests the deletion, making PROD inappropriate. Notwithstanding this, in my view the page should clearly be deleted per WP:NOTESSAY. It is, of course, possible that some of the content, if properly sourced and neutrally written, could find a place in already existing articles. Steve Smith (talk) 07:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I endorsed the original PROD, and in retrospect, I should have understood the comments on the talk page as a contest of the PROD. Kudos to Steve Smith for doing the right thing. In any event, the article is an essay in its current state (see WP:NOTESSAY). It looks like there are sources that discuss conflicts between the Myanmar government and the Zomi people, but information about that topic should be discussed at the articles for Zo people, Zomi nationalism, or Chin State per WP:PAGEDECIDE. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per my original prod. I agree entirely with Steve Smith. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:12, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:12, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.