Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zombie vs. humans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Phaedriel - 23:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zombie vs. humans[edit]

Nominated for speedy deletion under category G1 (patent nonsense). It definitely is not patent nonsense; it makes perfect sense, but it is of questionable notability and unreferenced. No vote from me. Sam Blacketer 20:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as I originally tagged. It is simply something someone made up in class one day. Not notable. Realkyhick 21:05, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Possible weak keep, formally known as Humans Vs. Zombies aka HVZ (but the other way around is just catchier) and is becoming pretty popular on campuses, but student newspapers are normally not considered reliable enough sources for notability establishment. Goucher (claimed origin), Cornell, Wesleyan, Baylor ... and these seem to be independent campus-oriented newspapers that have covered it: Western Herald and Etownian. --Dhartung | Talk 21:12, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nonsense. Jonathan I like to eat science textbooks. 00:04, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - definitely nonsense. /Blaxthos 11:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As much as I love zombie movies, this article is nonsense.--Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 21:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Offer to Help - This is a terrible article that is unbecoming of this great game, played internationally on college campuses. I would be willing to help write a new article, if any Wikipedia enthusiasts want to help, please contact me through http://www.HumansVsZombies.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.240.10.175 (talk) 19:37, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable game. Strong delete. - Mike Rosoft 13:05, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.