Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoher and co
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Zoher and co[edit]
Delete - entry is only an ad ChemGardener 00:41, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable Tom Harrison Talk 01:28, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. —ERcheck @ 01:35, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete pn - maybe a CSD for no content? --M@thwiz2020 02:25, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-encyc, ad. The Deviant 02:46, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No thanks.--ragesoss 04:01, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep reworded, stub tab added. Partly to counter systemic bias and partly based on Ghits for "Zoher and Company" (which it would need renaming if it survived this AfD) Jcuk 08:30, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ad as per Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 15:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Question Dont understand the Crystal Ball comment, could you explain please? Jcuk 19:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. per nom. Arbustoo 21:44, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom incog 17:23, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Latinus 20:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.