Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoe Weizenbaum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 15:29, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zoe Weizenbaum

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Speedy~~ Delete: blatantly non-notable in any respect, including as an actress. Quis separabit? 13:26, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:04, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:04, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Film credits for Missing in America, 12 and Holding and Memoirs of a Geisha are sufficient to meet the criteria for WP:NACTOR. This is WP:AfD, not WP:SPEEDY, by the way, and the only criterion you could have used is WP:A7 which couldn't possibly apply to anyone with four film credits. You could argue that Weizenbaum's roles were too minor to count, but a brief perusal of film reviews for the above shows her name mentioned prominently in many of them, indicating that critics in major media took notice of this actor and said so. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:49, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know this is not a speedy delete case; I know the tag well. I just worded it that way to indicate my belief that this was a clear cut case. I see that not everyone agrees. Quis separabit? 00:23, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per Bratland. Credits in one major film and two seemingly well-regarded indies, plus Best Actress at the Monaco International Film Festival,[1] are enough. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:00, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I suppose simply with this although this is also vulnerable to BLP issues of someone with only a few (albeit notable) roles and there's not much to add to the article given the low amount of good sources here, here, here, here and here. I would've actually said redirect elsewhere (to one article) if it wasn't for the several movies. SwisterTwister talk 17:33, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.