Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoe Trope (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:13, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zoe Trope[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1st AFD was in 2004 which predictably ignored the only solid point, the book has a few reviews but is not significantly notable to be considered an important work which would suggest the author is notable, almost no reliable sources for the author herself exist other than entries in book directories.neon white talk 10:47, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete author of one book, which is real and not vanity-press or POD, and thus more notable than the bulk of supposed "authors" who show up at AFD, but still not notable enough for an article. An article on the book might be possible though. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 22:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.