Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoe Brigitta Littlepage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:49, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zoe Brigitta Littlepage

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Woman-with-a-job. I suppose you could say the settlement amounts are a claim of notability, so no WP:A7 speedy, but the little coverage there is falls under WP:ROUTINE. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 11:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless fixed: As it stands, the article is promotional, and rests on a set of sources that are mostly directory entries and articles about cases Littlepage has handled which either only mention her in passing or do not mention her at all. However, the section on "Legal Career" mentions a lot of awards and notable achievements, and if sources could be provided for most of these, it might prove notability. ubiquity (talk) 17:11, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Even if all true, I do not see any notability-granting award (unless maybe the Fortune list, which I could not track down). The $$ amounts are another thing, but not that impressive by US standards (with much larger damage money than in other countries). Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 08:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lawyers are not default notable. Lawyers who advertise heavily in local media markets to attract clients still are not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable. The cases listed don't represent anything unusual in American legal practice and would not confer notability even with sources. agtx 16:43, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.