Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ziyad Hanna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:19, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ziyad Hanna

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability via GNG. When considering as an academic, the number of papers and citation count seems to fall short - not surprisingly because he is more active as a business executive than as an academic. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:09, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:09, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no indication of notability, either general or as an academic; the cited sources are either trivial passing mentions or routine career announcements. Statements about key achievents are unsourced. Huon (talk) 11:16, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 09:41, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. His academic accomplishments (including his citation record on Google Scholar in what is a high-citation field) fall short of WP:PROF, and we have no evidence of WP:GNG for his business accomplishments. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.