Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zirconium Propionate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Ifnord 03:49, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not contain substantive material and appears to have been created to promote the company linked to products ChemGardener 01:30, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep after the rewrite ChemGardener 15:59, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Blanket advertising.*drew 01:38, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Keep after the rewrite. *drew 11:12, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ruby 01:53, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Keep after fix. Ruby 02:39, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep it around and maybe someone will improve it someday. Also, the IP who created it didn't do it as spam; check their contributions >50 edits, only a few chemicals. --James S. 02:50, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yesterday I suggested we keep a different article around to see what happens, and nearly tripped over all the crystal balls that were tossed at me. Ruby 03:24, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- You were sadly misinterpreted yesterday. Everyone thought you meant wait and see if the subject took off, not the article. Or something. - squibix 02:36, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I tried to clean it up and expand it a little, but there's not much information about it online. -- Kjkolb 04:18, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, but I'd ditch the external link to the manufacturer. -HiFiGuy 07:22, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I've tidied & corrected & removed the link. Its OK as a stub I think. --Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 10:17, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Decent rewrite. Move to Zirconium propionate, maybe? Sam Vimes 11:13, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as rewritten. Rename per Sam Vimes. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-27 21:30Z
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.