Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zing Pop Culture
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 06:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Zing Pop Culture[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Zing Pop Culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Most of the sources are press releases or routine. A search in google news finds much the same. Fails WP:NCORP. LibStar (talk) 06:07, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Popular culture, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 06:07, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Agree with nom. Fails WP:CORP, none of the sources establish notability. GMH Melbourne (talk) 07:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, lack of notability with no sources to back up corporate claims. -Samoht27 (talk) 13:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:CORP, no inherent or inherited notability. Spinifex&Sand (talk) 02:49, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- If there is no independent notability this should Redirect to its parent company EB Games Australia. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.