Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zincubate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 06:19, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zincubate

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company; promotional. The two sources don't appear to be reliable (one was written by the site's founder), and I can't find any others. The article, while possibly not blatantly so, is too promotional overall in tone for an encyclopedia article. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Notability has not been established. Press release citations are insufficient evidence of notability. MrX 18:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - New company with little coverage outside of press releases and social networking sites. noq (talk) 18:28, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:08, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in independent reliable sources. One of the two refs is not independent as the article is by the founder of Zincubate. The Naples News item is actually non-significant coverage in a run down of minor happenings. -- Whpq (talk) 16:35, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.