Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zim Blog Awards

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:51, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zim Blog Awards[edit]

Zim Blog Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

too soon to be able to determine notability--there have not even been any awards so far DGG ( talk ) 04:23, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:52, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:52, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The awards were launched and held last year at Moto Republik in Harare my fellow colleague DGG, i did a research and added more references that am sure Ceethekreator was to add. I believe in finding ways to improve a page before tagging for deletation, lets work on it as a team. It was just a matter of adding citations. Hurungudo (talk) 09:48, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • On the fence; send to draft? On the one hand, we've got a newspaper source that says the awards were slated to happen last year. On the other, we have no source for the winners and no indication that there were 2019 awards. Frankly, I don't think the nominator has made a compelling argument to delete it, but I also don't think the article's current condition makes a compelling case to keep it. I almost think the best approach is to send this to draft space for incubation. If draft isn't an option, I'd rather keep it than delete it. —C.Fred (talk) 00:08, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the note, have added a source for the winners list.Hurungudo (talk) 10:30, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Szzuk (talk) 07:28, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 12:46, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.