Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhu Xen Niang Niang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep after rewrite. Sandstein (talk) 19:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zhu Xen Niang Niang

Translated from another language very poorly. I cannot understand most of it, and as such, if the original creator needed to translate it with the use of a tool which they more than likely know doesn't really work, then we cannot ask them to help out with fixing the English, I would imagine. I doubt anyone else will be able to fix the article, as I doubt they will be able to salvage much from it. Also, even though this is supposed to be an 'encyclopaedic' article, I still don't even get the most basic thing which should be conveyed - what 'Zhu Xen Niang Niang' is! αѕєηιηє ^t/_c 06:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am at a complete and utter loss to try and explain this. May very well be a Babelfish translation. Even though this may be in good faith, speedy delete as nonsense. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It is indeed a Google (or Babelfish) translation of this Chinese Wikipedia article linked inside the text. There doesn't seem to be any non-Chinese article linked to it. Unless someone is willing to chuck this into a needing-translation bin, we should probably delete. --Dhartung | Talk 07:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I just have no idea what to do with this page short of asking an expert, but it can't stay like it is.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 09:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep restubbed and fixed it. More hits as "Songzi Niangniang" or "Sung Tsu Niangniang"; "Zhusheng Niangniang" is just the Taiwan name, according to one of the sources. Still needs an expert cuz I'm way out of my depth on all this Taoism stuff and the sources can't even agree on her name, her relation to images of Kuan Yin, etc. cab (talk) 14:34, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Changing to keep. Nice save. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. —Lowellian (reply) 21:40, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:HEY. New article written, notability established. --Dhartung | Talk 04:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.