Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZhenFund

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 18:39, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ZhenFund

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Just like the article on one of the founders, Victor Wang (Angel Investor) (afd), created by the same SPA, there is a lack of coverage in independent reliable sources. A look at the current sourcing: TechNode, tech blog with rehash of a routine press release; crunchbase, database listings; zh.wikipedia.org, openly collaborative wiki encyclopedia, not a reliable source; Baidu Baike, openly collaborative wiki encyclopedia, not a reliable source; Bloomberg, about another company, doesn't mention ZhenFund; Forbes Magazine, about another company, doesn't mention ZhenFund; PRNewswire, enough said; ZhenFund, not independent. See also Bob Xu, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Xu and Qiang (Victor) Wang. This is just poorly sourced promotion. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 10:50, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 10:50, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 10:50, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Promotional article. Junk sources like Crunchbase, PR Newswire, etc. CorporateM (Talk) 05:54, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮JAaron95 ^Talk 18:16, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as well as my searches found nothing better than what I mentioned at Bob's AfD. SwisterTwister talk 05:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.