Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhe Zeng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. BLP doesn't apply, mainly the L part, sadly. The "one event" portion apparently doesn't either, as has become notable beyond his death (street naming), and it has been adequately sourced. There are "memorial" issues though, could use some cleanup to read less like an obituary, IMO. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 16:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zhe Zeng[edit]

Non-notable victim of 9/11. Jmlk 1 7 05:41, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep, as normally I would cite WP:BIO1E, but having a street named in his honor I think pushes it toward lasting notability. hateless 09:23, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak keep as he was a volunteer first responder, not sure how many of those are in the victims list and how many first responder victims have articles tho. --Dhartung | Talk 10:54, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - whilst tragic, victims do not warrant articles on their own per WP:BLP1E Fritzpoll (talk) 14:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant Delete He seemed like a really good person. Unfortunately, a lot of good people died that day, and I see no evidence why he should be singled out. The sources are largely memorials, something that Wikipedia is not. WP:BLP1E applies here. If the street named after him were notable, I might think otherwise, but it is not.--FreeKresge (talk) 16:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, if he was any any other 9/11 victim I would say to delete it;BUT since he had a street named after him then I say to keep it, some government body decided to have him and his story memorialized.Callelinea (talk) 02:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep having a street named after him asserts some notability (more so than most other victims of 9/11). dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 11:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.