Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhang Milin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:14, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zhang Milin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was tagged notability but was removed by the article creator. It is likely that it will be deproded so I put this into AFD. There is not enough reliable sources found when performing WP:BEFORE. The only cited reliable source in the article does not address the subject directly so it doesn't meet WP:GNG. Meets none of the criterion listed at WP:PROF or WP:BIO Sun8908 _Talk 05:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Sun8908 _Talk 05:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Sun8908 _Talk 05:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The Zhang Milin described here, of Tsinghua University, appears to be the one described by this Google Scholar profile and this IEEE profile. She should not be confused with the Zhang Milin of Harbin Engineering University who (as part of a large group of authors) has written heavily cited publications on graphene supercapacitors. There is no evidence that the nominator found any of this in WP:BEFORE, but regardless, I don't think she passes WP:PROF — she has citation counts on a good track, but not yet at the level of impact required for #C1, and the other criteria appear very unlikely. There's a big language barrier for me to search for sources in Chinese, though, so if someone who can read Chinese turns up evidence of WP:GNG-type notability instead, I'm open to changing my mind. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:25, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. this is WP:TOOSOON by a long shot, her citations do not pass WP:NPROF#1. --hroest 01:42, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.