Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zetavault

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:21, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zetavault

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pure promotion, just a litany of features and some promotional links instead of any independent sources. W Nowicki (talk) 17:38, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prod was reverted without comment. Only one editor who has touched only one other article. W Nowicki (talk) 17:47, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion is not justified. The page describes features of the product without any promotion. Chiz (talk) 18:05, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:01, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. W Nowicki (talk) 18:04, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiz: Article lacks references to reliable sources (reviews, news coverage in magazines/renowned sites, books about subject of the article etc.). Pavlor (talk) 10:54, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no references provided that meet WP:RS and nothing in the article that suggests notability. The article is purely promotional. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 20:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as entirely trivial and unconvincing, nothing here for any actual substance since it seems to be a minor software. SwisterTwister talk 06:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.