Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero Two Infinity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:33, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zero Two Infinity

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary dab page. This is a WP:TWODABS situation, handled by hatnotes in each article. — JFG ^talk 14:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (to infinity and beyond) or redirect to Zero 2 Infinity and add a hatnote to Zero to Infinity. There's only one entry and one near match. "WP:ONEDAB" applies. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a valid disambiguation page per guidelines on WP:DISAMBIG: It is necessary to provide links and disambiguation pages so that readers typing in a reasonably likely topic name for more than one Wikipedia topic can quickly navigate to the article they seek. Then nomination refers to WP:TWODABS however there is not a guideline for two dabs which says the page should be deleted if only two pages. It is actually a redirect with guidance to keep disambig when neither page is primary. Wm335td (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Zero 2 Infinity which has a hatnote to the similar-sounding other use. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:03, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 05:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:29, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete hatnotes already sufficiently DAB the articles and redirecting would result in circular redirects. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:11, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.