Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero Tolerance Recordings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Phil K. And redirect. The !votes to delete weere to some extent countered by the possibility of a reliable source demonstrating notability; conversely, ther were no !Votes to keep the article. Ultimately tere was no demonstrable consensus to delete, so, per WP:ATD, closing as M&D. (non-admin closure) — fortunavelut luna 07:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zero Tolerance Recordings[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable record label. - TheMagnificentist 15:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:10, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:10, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:10, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment for now. This may or may not be notable. Label was in operation for some time, and did release music by notable artists, so it may be a notable record label per NMUSIC#5. According to [1] it was "highly influential" but I don't know enough about the genre to know if this is a reliable source or not. Having a hard time finding sources that would satisfy GNG. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Phil K: one of the label's owners, a solo artist and half of a duo on the label.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:55, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 12:09, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- the article fails to establish notability. It lists no sources and significant coverage is likewise not found. http://inthemix.junkee.com does not sound like a reliable source for the purpose of establishing notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable, trivia. Kierzek (talk) 19:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or redirect/merge to Phil K?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 09:13, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge & redirect, there is a source confirming Phil K is or was a part owner. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:16, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.