Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero Emissions Research and Initiatives "ZERI"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Non-admin closure. Jujutacular ^T · C 23:28, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zero Emissions Research and Initiatives "ZERI"

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Organisation dedicated to sustainablity. Several external links but do any of them demonstrate notability? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per [1] [2] [3]. Jennifer500 (talk) 21:34, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Has sufficient notability. It should be moved to Zero Emissions Research and Initiatives or ZERI if it is kept. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 02:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:27, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: One of the editors who've suggested to Keep is blocked as a sock of a banned user. I will give it a final relist for more consensus. JForget 00:33, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per significant coverage in sources. Werner Heisenberg (talk) 01:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Notability concerns seem just satisfied by sources, although that feels like more a judgement call on my part than anything resembling certainty. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 04:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.