Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zepetto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 11:52, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zepetto[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company fails WP:ORG, many sources for its games but none for Zepetto itself. The intro is WP:CV of zepetto.com Dewritech (talk) 10:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zero references, zero indication of wp:notability. Looks self-written in biased promotional wording.North8000 (talk) 15:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) Thibbs (talk) 15:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No improvements after being deleted under A7, no assertion of notability. hmssolent\Let's convene 02:13, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm unable to find sufficient coverage in reliable sources for this subject to meet WP:GNG or WP:ORG. Gong show 07:34, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:39, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:39, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.