Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zenuity
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:34, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- Zenuity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The sources in the article are insufficient to establish notability. Seems to too soon also. BilCat (talk) 16:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:55, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:55, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG -- HighKing++ 16:20, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: An article on a new joint venture, which is also covered in the article on one of the parties, at Autoliv#Autonomous_Driving. The brief Sydsvenskan item does not seem to go beyond coverage of the start-up. Perhaps one day this will prove to have been an important venture but at the moment I am not seeing sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 17:15, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.