Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeegpaw
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Self-published book (Lulu.com); not encyclopaedic, and probably added by the author (who also inserted a paragraph about the book on Blondi). CSD G11 may well apply, but I'm not sure, so I think it's better to err on the side of caution and go through the regular AfD process. Schneelocke 12:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - no assertion of notability. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 16:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable or based on reliable sources. Abeg92contribs 19:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.