Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zbig Kepa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 18:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zbig Kepa[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails athletics specific notability requirements and gng. Nothing notable in his college playing career in division 3, no pro experience and no head coaching. John from Idegon (talk) 04:53, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I could find nothing but routine local newspaper coverage of changes of position between three local schools and a few quotes, not much different than what is, or was, found on the school web sites. No head coaching or professional league coaching experience. Does not meet specific sports notability standards or WP:GNG. Donner60 (talk) 10:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm afraid I have to agree for now. One day he could pass the threshold of notability, perhaps one day soon. But we have to judge on "now" don't we. Hope so!--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:12, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not finding the kind of significant coverage needed in multiple, reliable, and independent sources to satisfy WP:GNG. Cbl62 (talk) 15:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.