Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zazie (surrealist) (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Zazie (surrealist)[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Zazie (surrealist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable cyberartist. No references beyond artist's site. Article probably created by the subject, or friends. Most definitely edited by personal friends of hers. Strong conflict of interest. Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 18:25, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Very thin assertations of notability. The fact that she's been in a magazine is the only thing keeping me from tagging this as A7. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As above, nothing much in the way of notability, and even less in the way of verifiability. Just a hair away from an A7. Note that the article has remained essentially untouched since 2006 or so, not a good sign that any notability is likely to show up anytime soon. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:18, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Proxy User (talk) 21:07, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a discussion, not a vote. Please provide your reasoning, or your voice will be ignored. Thank you.--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 13:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.