Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaw Naing Thein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zaw Naing Thein

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible covert UPE article on a non notable entrepreneur who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of him thus fails to satisfy WP:GNG. The ref bombing is a merely a mirage to inject a sense of notability. Celestina007 (talk) 06:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 06:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 06:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 06:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 06:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Yikes!! This one doesn't come close enough to passing GNG to even make an argument. I'm sure he's done amazing things to get where he is but if it's not discussed in reliable sources in this age of internet and media coverage then I'm not sure it ever will be. REFBOMB'ing the article will not add any credible points to it's validity. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 20:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this vanity page. No independent coverage in reliable sources that I can see, though if someone who speaks Burmese can find a few I'd be completely open to changing my !vote. FalconK (talk) 02:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just another vanity article for a non-notable businessperson. DmitriRomanovJr (talk) 10:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.