Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zatikon (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:32, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zatikon[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A seemingly unnotable game that fails WP:GNG/WP:NVG. The article contains some sources, but all of them are either primary or from tertiary and unreliable websites (including the Adrenaline Vault, which is unreliable per WP:VG/RS). A quick google in our reliable sources search engine (WP:VG/SE) shows just one WP:PASSING mention. IceWelder [✉] 11:29, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. IceWelder [✉] 11:29, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just seeing this now; in the last AfD (2010), the article was also deleted. Pinging past commenters: @Extra999, Teancum, and Cirt. IceWelder [✉] 11:30, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - nicely formatted references mean nothing if they aren't reliable. Unfortunately I stick with deletion --Teancum (talk) 22:14, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment May meet WP:NGAMES, fails WP:GNG and even if this is deleted there will still bean article on the Portuguese Wikipedia. –Cupper52^Discuss! 11:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.