Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zara Stone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 07:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zara Stone

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not appear to meet the general notability guideline (WP:SIGCOV) because of a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. While the article contains references, rather than sources about the subject, they are either links to the subject's works or links to works that reference the subject's works. Bsherr (talk) 02:36, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bsherr (talk) 02:36, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Bsherr (talk) 02:36, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear at this point. The article is certainly problematic, reliant almost entirely on primary sources, but she has an awful lot of credits in high-profile publications. Will have to dig a bit... — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 03:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete subject possesses very little notability that does not qualify per WP:GNG . Celestina007 (talk) 18:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.