Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zana Krasniqi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per consensus. (non-admin closure) Jax 0677 (talk) 14:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zana Krasniqi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: non-notable pageant winner. Quis separabit? 20:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:53, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:53, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:53, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:32, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep nomination did not make a case why only this national titleholder for miss universe would be non-notable, did not explain what is wrong with the references that were provided and the others that are readily available, and fails WP:IGNORINGATD. I enjoy working with the nominator and have given him recognition for his work before. That isn't the problem! gidonb (talk) 21:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Top position in one of the top4 biggest pageants in the world. Also per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 14:58, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per a Wikipedia search, this AfD can't delete this topic from the encyclopedia, so the claim that the topic is non-notable is at most, as per WP:Deletion policy#CONTENT, a topic for discussion on the talk page or if necessary at RfC. See also WP:INSIGNIFICANCE. Were there any evidence to support the argument, a wrong venue result might be considered, but no evidence is provided. Unscintillating (talk) 01:47, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.