Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zamboanga Golf and Country Club (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zamboanga Golf and Country Club

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous nominated on promotinal grounds. Still does not appear to be a notable golf course. The claim of being the one of the oldest in the country still doesn't quite cover WP:NGEO Ajf773 (talk) 19:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 01:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 April 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - couldn't find any significant independent reliable coverage to establish notability. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable golf course....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This extraordinary article about the other oldest-golf-course contender, Iloilo Golf and Country Club, provides some more information about the Zamboanga course. I am quite sure they both are notable. --do ncr am 11:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Doncram: Extroadinary article? It is a self published blog post. SPS blogs can't be used to establish notability. Read WP:RS and WP:SPS....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.