Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zamalek SC Honours
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 17:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Zamalek SC Honours (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Page not needed. Completely duplicates contents already found at Zamalek SC. Nick Moyes (talk) 16:29, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Nick Moyes (talk) 16:29, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - redundant article Spiderone 18:19, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:19, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Not a properly done spinout, and if a spinout were to be done, cut down the content in the original. Besides, why should a list of awards/honors need a separate page? it isn't that large. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 19:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:29, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - does not merit separate article. GiantSnowman 08:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of Zamalek SC records and statistics, where honours are already covered in a more standard way -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:42, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, not sure a redirect is needed, does it have that many hits? Govvy (talk) 11:24, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 15:55, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.