Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaire Mitchell-Paden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm generally unwilling to draftify unless there's someone with the stated intent of working on the draft; and with only a single !vote to redirect, there's no consensus for it. If further evidence of notability is found, restoring the history is an option. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:32, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zaire Mitchell-Paden

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:Notability (people) for sports. Relies on a single source of a signing, but this does not signify importance. Debartolo2917 (talk) 05:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football, and Ohio. Shellwood (talk) 07:32, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify until he makes his NFL debut. Not finding much SIGCOV. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:56, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify for now. This is a situation where WP:TOOSOON might apply. SPF121188 ^{(talk this way)} ^(contribs) 20:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Cleveland Browns#Current roster so that the history is preserved and an article could be recreated when it's appropriate and viable to do so. My issue with draftification is that this is time limited with regards to how long a draft is expected to exist, and I can't see any solid evidence this player will warrant an article within the next six months (not to say that won't happen, but I think a redirect which is indefinite and at least serves a purpose is a better all-round solution in this case, compared to a draft). Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. While this article covers him plenty, GNG requires multiple sources of significant coverage which I was unable to find on Google and Newspapers.com. Alvaldi (talk) 13:32, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draft or Delete take your pick. Article isn't ready for publication without more sourcing.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:34, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify, not yet notable and is a case of WP:TOOSOON.Hey man im josh (talk) 19:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.