Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zainab Usman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zainab Usman[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACADEMIC, WP:NAUTHOR, WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. Her h-index is 4. Almost all of the references are examples of her writing in various publications. The only in-depth coverage is ref#2 which is primarily a piece written by Usman but has an introduction to her as author by Nasir Ahmad el-Rufai.

Note that the article was written by a suspected WP:UPE who has subsequently been blocked for sockpuppetry. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

del absolutely no independent indication of notability.Staszek Lem (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Her Google Scholar citation counts are not as bad as I was expecting: h-index=4, in this case, means four publications with double-digit citations. But it's still not good enough for WP:PROF#C1, I found no reviews of her book, and there is no other claim of notability in the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 20:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not seeing any evidence of notabilty under WP:NPROF or WP:AUTHOR. Maybe WP:TOOSOON. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Fails WP:ANYBIO. Celestina007 (talk) 04:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.