Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaid Ali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 20:57, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zaid Ali[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page is promotional for internet personality and though it has some notability, does not feel worth for an article Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This person is notable enough as he is not just a internet personality but a public figure. He recently toured U.K for a comedy show. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 16:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: In order to claim being a public figure, reliable sources should be provided. All sources in the article as well as found in google are talking about Internet Mem, which is clearly not enough for having an article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 16:38, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The sources I provided are acclaimed news agencies not an individual running website. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 16:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~^{^{(Struck duplicate. Your nomination itself means delete sami ^talk 09:47, 8 May 2015 (UTC))}}: The sources you provided all talk about youtube sensation. Wikipedia:Notability_(people) talks about having significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. No such reference were provided.Arthistorian1977 (talk) 17:12, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at Tours section for person's notability. Do check the references. Moreover the article is stub and needs to be further expanded. Let it be decided by other reviewrs too and let see what the discussion comes to :) Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 18:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-Per nom. BTW I could of swore a article with this name has been deleted. Wgolf (talk) 20:26, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The subject passes WP:SIGCOV. Although the page was deleted as sworn by Wgolf, the possibility is that the new users might have written in informal or promotional tone. Title was salted but has been allowed by MusikAnimal for creation. The article cites reliable, independent sources such as Dawn News, ARY News, Express Tribune etc. If the promotional tone is the only concern, the article can be emended instead of deletion. sami ^talk 09:43, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. He is a well-known Canadian Asian video makers. However the article seems to be spoilt. I will improve it.-- $AHLM13$ talk 12:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quite easily passes WP:GNG based on coverage in WP:RS, including [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] and many more. Mar4d (talk) 04:16, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.