Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zagreus (audio drama) (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Daniel (talk) 01:51, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zagreus (audio drama) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant coverage and failing to meet general notability guidelines. I do not believe previous AFD discussion has identified adequate notability. Torpedoi (talk) 21:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:22, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, meets WP:GNG. The article needs some work; specifically, the plot summary needs to be cut to well under half of what it is, but the sources added during the previous AfD establish GNG.
    1. Starburst Magazine is a long running magazine.
    2. Sci-fi Online is a professional webzine reliable for such cases [1].
    3. I don't have access to the AHistory book, but apparently it is meant to cover such "canon" productions, so I would AGF on it.
Another source, Doctor Who Magazine is an "official" magazine so not sure on independence but may help as well. —siroχo 04:18, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.