Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zackary (2017 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 05:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zackary (2017 film)[edit]

Zackary (2017 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD was The only criterion of WP:NFILM that this stands a chance of passing is number 3. I don't, however, believe that Culver City Film Festival qualifies as a "major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking". Since this clearly fails the other 4 criteria and fails WP:GNG, I believe that it should be deleted. Please note that the five 'references' used are all press releases and rehashings of each other. No reviews found.

Contested with comment Removed some movie award references and added the reference of an interview/review about the movie too. Added Culver City Film Festival (international and acknowledged festival based in LA) reference.

I do not believe that the Culver City Film Festival award is enough for this to pass our notability criteria when every other criterion under NFILM is failed and when GNG is failed. This is a non-notable 7 minute film with a very minor award and no published reviews. The source added is not a review; it is an interview with the director where he expresses his opinion on the film. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NFILM, minor award not enough to satisfy guidelines. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I couldn't really find anything to establish notability either. The amount of false positives didn't make it easier to search either, honestly. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 04:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. No major awards, not enough coverage to pass GNG. Kolma8 (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Although Il Mattino is definitely a reliable source, all the rest of the coverage is it local Naples area newspapers, which republish LA festival press-release. In brief, one good reference is not enough to support notability. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 10:09, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the article is probably an undeclared WP:COI contribution of Margaret bali0, an account that created articles for the film director and two of his contributions. His other film, Dear Gaia (2019 film) is also nominated for deletion, for the same reasons as this one. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 10:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.