Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zachary Lipton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per consensus. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 02:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zachary Lipton[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See no nonability, neither a musician nor as researcher Loew Galitz (talk) 23:55, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:13, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:13, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
comment need more citation for notability — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henrycruise01 (talk • contribs) 07:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Just one reference - needs more for notability. Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:47, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has a paragraph in a Forbes article and a few other hits in PC mag Australia and the CBC, found in Google search. Several hits also in Gscholar as an author, several papers on AI.Oaktree b (talk) 23:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mild keep -- seems like a notable scholar who is interviewed periodically (https://www.compassdatacenters.com/compass-u/podcasts/zachary-lipton/) Gusfriend (talk) 09:27, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I saw a few direct references in Google News. This looks like a job for expansion, not deletion. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 20:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:07, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:19, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - The article definitely needs expansion to establish notability, but there are some sources available that may allow it to better demonstrate his notability. For example [1], an interview with India-based Observer Research Foundation, which appears reliable and also provides a short preamble that describes his work as a researcher who helped develop Amazon's deep learning as well as some of his published works. Dfadden (talk) 11:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.