Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zach Dodson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 22:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zach Dodson

Does not meet WP:BIO. Primary claim to notability is writing a graphic novel, but it's published by his own company (AFD) and apparently not due until Fall 2008. His company may, may, be notable, but Dodson himself is given only passing mentions in reliable, independent sources. —Cryptic 02:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as above. Assertions of notability may not be supported. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ukexpat (talk) 15:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above, company is barely notable and he is less notable than that. Mr mark taylor (talk) 01:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find any news coverage of Zach himself. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 02:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. Darrenhusted (talk) 13:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. and others.--JustJimDandy (talk) 15:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:21, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only real reference appears to be his college newspaper.DGG (talk) 20:31, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Google News and Google News Archive comes up with nothing on him. [1] Sources seem to be lacking at this stage. If his graphic novel is reasonably successful, we can reconsider the matter then. Capitalistroadster (talk) 20:41, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. Fails every policy and guideline invoked in this discussion. And while we're at it, don't forget to vote Delete on both of the associated AfDs, which should have been bundled to this one, Jonathan Messinger and Featherproof books. Qworty (talk) 02:36, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. May be worth an article once he expands beyond the local scene. Gamaliel (talk) 17:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.