Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zach Auguste

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 13:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zach Auguste[edit]

Zach Auguste (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

college athlete who hasn't done anything to make himself notable.CrazyAces489 (talk) 23:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NBASKETBALL doesn't play basketball at the highest level in any of the leagues he has been in. Has not won any major sports awards. CrazyAces489 (talk) 23:18, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CrazyAces489 (talk)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I wouldn't have thought Auguste would meet WP:GNG, but I think the sources provided by Hansi667 demonstrate that he does. Rikster2 (talk) 20:12, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

comment look at WP:NBASKETBALL . CrazyAces489 (talk) 23:18, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
GNG supercedes any SSG WP:NBASKETBALL is secondary to the general notability guideline and if he met the sport-specific guideline but didn't meet GNG it could still be deleted. Rikster2 (talk) 23:33, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
comment look at WP:NHOOPS CrazyAces489 (talk) 23:18, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't matter. GNG trumps all other specific guidelines, and Auguste meets GNG. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Hansi667 demonstrating Auguste meets general notability requirements. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.